Peer ReviewPeer Review 
1. First you have to read through the essay. 2. Find the evidence and examples on the topic the person was writing about. 3. You have to look for the clear thesis statement in the introduction paragraph. 4. After you find that thesis statement, you again have to read through the essay to see if the essay follows the thesis. 5. If that is all right you have to look for the errors in the paper and try to help the other person by giving the comments on each paragraph, and also by giving suggestion of what could each paragraph consist of. 6. You have to check if the organization is right, if all the parts are in the good order. 7. You have to make sure that there is no plagiarism in the paper by checking out the sources. 8. You also have to make suggestions on the criteria. 9. If you show that other parson that they have been repeating words and you show them where, that would also help them too. 10. At the end of peer reviewing it would be good if you grade that paper for them just to show them how exactly they did in somebody else’s opinion. Here is the example of the peer review. "Peer review In the paper, Rosemery is convincing the reader to what good journal writing is. She has a good focus on the topic. The essay is clear, because in all of her paragraphs she is talking about what a good journal supposed to consist of. This essay would be easy to summarize because in the beginning of all of her paragraphs she states what is will be talking about. Her thesis statement talks about the clear and understandable essay, good vocabulary, examples and supportive ideas, and organization. But there is one thing that she has missed in the introduction. In the last sentence, she has included all of the things she has talked about throughout the essay except of one. Her sixth paragraph talks about writing and staying on topic. She has not included that in her introduction. She needs to add that in her thesis sentence. Another thing that I realized in her paper is that she is repeating herself. For example, she is talking about use of big and strong words which reader cannot understand and than in the same sentence she says that those strong words cannot be understood by the reader. That is just translating the same sense of the sentence, but in the different words. Her paper appears to be on topic and interesting for others to read. That words she is using are not hard to understand. She is using good vocabulary. There is only few grammar mistakes. In the first paragraph she was talking about clear and understandable essay. In there she talks about coherence which I think should be stated with a staying on topic and taking about one thing at the time. " (AS) | 