goodwriting

eg4

        Cross-cultural adaptation


          Some foreign people have an easier time adapting to life in other country than other people. Bernard Malamud in his story “The Jewbird” shows us what factors may help to influence the cross-cultural adaptation of someone. The author’s different points of views trod Cohen’s attitudes against Jewbird, their bizarre behavior, and last the way how they are trying to learn to adapt like a family.
       

        The story shows how Cohen’s attitudes have a conflict against Schwartz. Cohen has many ways of demonstrating his aggressiveness forms, in the story he uses a lot of bad language for being a Jew. “Poor bird, my ass. He’s a foxy bastard. He thinks he’s a Jew” (p. 738). This indicates that Cohen thinks he is a better Jew than Schwartz, which shows that Cohen has been under the influence of the different culture, around him: “This ain’t a restaurant,” Cohen replied (p. 736), “Who’s obligated to feed you anything at all? You’re lucky to get herring” (p. 739). This also proves Cohen has not any kindness to Schwartz. 
 

         The author is trying to demonstrate the bizarre behavior of different people, which they are in the same Jewish culture. Eddie and Maurie offer Schwartz hospitality in their home. “Let him stay, papa” “He is only a bird” (p.738). His wife tries than Cohen to understand that Schwartz is not a problem at all. “He’s no trouble at all”. (p.738).
     Unfortunately Cohen’s behavior and frustration against the bird drives him to commit a violent action without compassion and conscious. He never felt guilty in the moment that he committed Schawartz’s death. “That’s the end of that dirty bastard” (p.741).  He tries to justify his action by saying “what that sonofabitch bird did. It’s a permanent scar” (p.741); and he argued that the bird flew away. “I threw him out and he flew away”. (p.741)
     Cohen couldn’t wait for Schwartz to give him a good reason to attack him. When Cohen was “attacked” by Schwartz, he left him a permanent scar; which I think represent the way he has been adapted to Jewish culture, but he has forgotten his original culture because of the influence from another country.
           

       Like a family is important to learn the different forms of adaptation in a new country, without forgetting their own culture. In the story, you can see how Schwartz to adapt to a new environment. “He wants to build a nest” (p.740) Cohen didn’t have the ability to be comfortable with accepting the bird as a new family member. “Cohen, why do you hate me so much?” and he said  “you’re an A-number-one trouble maker, that’s why”.  Cohen sees Schwartz like an intruder in his home, even though they both share a common culture. This feeling that Cohen has, it doesn’t necessarily mean that Schwartz is an intruder because he was very educated, helpful and caring for everyone in the household. 
     
      

        With this story in my opinion, the author is telling us just because we might be in a different country, this doesn’t mean to leave and forget your own culture. Also we shouldn’t change the behavior and attitudes; and we have to learn to adapt our customs, feelings and beliefs under the new circumstances. 
 

Harper, M (2002). Issue and the individual reading for College
     Composition
(2th edition). boston: McGraw-hill .

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments

From rojasjua - 2005-12-06 3:48 PM

The essay has a good introduction where she talked as me about how we can analyze the literature story. I am agree with her about the story can help us to understand a particular situation, culture, religion in our daily lives. I think that she needed to read a lot about Jewish because in this essay she talked about what was the 10 commandments. Also she talked about Torah when talked about how is a good Jew.  

I am agree with her, the story we could find two different kind of Jewish people. Cohen symbolized a bad Jew, he is a person with a lot problem and he reflects that with his family and the humanity. He likes a particular kind of Jew people, he is an Anti Semite. Cohen needs that somebody shows him how someone can be a good Jewish. Schwartz symbolized a good Jew. He is very smart because he can talk with Cohen’s family and he wants that Cohen bring to his charity, Schwartz want a family. Schwartz thinks good things for Cohen’s family.

 I like she said, “ I think no matter which is your religion, we don’t have to kill anyone, and least because that people have different manner to live”, because It is not important what is that religion the people belong, everybody needs to be a good person with other people that need their charity. He has good evidence and his thesis statement is very interesting because it is not common.
 
I have two advices for her, the first thing is, she needs to unite the interpretation, evidence and analyze in one paragraph. And the second thing is she can talk more in the conclusion about the story and how the story influence in her life.

In my personal opinion I think that  United Stated you can find  a lot religion with different ideologies, cultures, customs and different meaning  but people has to respect the life and anybody has the power to kill other person. 

   

Site

Changes
Index
Search

 

User

 

Log In

 
 

Last Modified December 13, 2005