Computing, Diversity and Community: Fostering the Computing Culture
Danielle R. Bernstein
Mathematics/Computer Science Dept.
Kean University, Union, New Jersey 07083
Presented at the 28th SIGCSE Conference, San Jose, CA, February,
How do we attract and retain women in mathematics and science and specifically in computing? Women drop out of every bend of the pipeline and thus lose the opportunity to seek good, appealing and high-paying jobs. Funded by an eight-semester long National Science Foundation grant , the University of Wisconsin (UW) Women and Science program aims to reverse this attrition from the sciences at a point where it is most acute: the introductory courses in the undergraduate science curriculum.
This paper focusses on one particular innovation in the computing curriculum: extending the content of a traditional first term computer science course in program design and development to include the culture of computing. The paper gives specific examples of computing artifacts and their uses in any computing classroom. It also shows the connection between teaching the culture of computing and the objectives of the Women and Science project.The Women and Science Program
The University of Wisconsin Women and Science program aims to reverse female and minority attrition from the sciences by changing the content, pedagogical techniques and classroom climate of the introductory courses in the undergraduate science curriculum. This program seeks to reach students, who, though qualified to do science, choose another major. Since the innovations known to be effective with women and people of color have also attracted other students, the project should gradually increase the total number of students majoring in the sciences.
As a Distinguished Visiting Professor, I spent a term at the Stevens Point campus of the University of Wisconsin and worked with resident Faculty Fellows in a "trainer of trainer" faculty development model. The Faculty Fellows and I each taught a section of the introductory course in Computing (CIS1) and shared our innovations in the classroom with other science faculty at the university.Background
What do Sneakers, the Internet, Cliff Stoll, Sherry Turkle, Bill Gates and The Net have in common? They are part of the computing culture where culture is defined as the patterns, traits, products and artifacts of a particular period, class or population. In CIS1, in addition to teaching "fundamental computing concepts and structured programming using a higher level language," I introduced the class to the computing and information systems issues of the day, i.e., the culture of computing.
Computing is not just a set of skills; it is also a culture. At every level, students must be exposed to more than just the technical facts and techniques of a discipline. They must feel, think and act, not just like computing students, but like computing professionals. Teaching the culture of a field is not just necessary in computing. All fields have a culture, a set of norms, a non academic literature found in popular magazines, newspaper columns, best-selling books, movies, TV and even jokes. But the problem appears to be more acute in computer science where personal and academic computing tend to merge. In particular, computing is different from other majors in that so much of it is learned outside the formal classroom setting.
Computing is a whole alphabet soup of acronyms and buzzwords. Buzzwords and acronyms can make people feel either like they belong or like outsiders. In a new situation or place, you find new and idiosyncratic buzzwords thrown at you. But students will very rarely raise their hand in class and ask "What does that mean?" A few conscientious students might write down the unknown terms and promise themselves that they will look them up. But where can they even do that?
At a workshop, I asked:
What computing buzzwords do we expect students to know? And where are they expected to learn them?
The second question stumped most workshop participants, both faculty and students. The most common answer was "other people," that is, other people who are passionate about computing and hang around computing labs. One student said that they were expected to learn these buzzwords in FAQs (Frequently Asked Questions) section of news groups on the Internet. But then he realized that FAQ was itself a buzzword.Computing Culture and the Women and Science Project
Students, coming into computing, enter with a great disparity of knowledge. Some students have been around computers ever since they can remember and others only know what they have learned in school. This has important implications for attracting women into computing. In Hale (1995) , Ellen Spertus at Microsoft notes that "It used to be that no one entered college with any knowledge of computers so everyone was on an equal footing. Now boys have more hands-on experience and women know it."
The greatest predictor of success with computers is prior exposure: mucking about and experimenting (Bernstein, 1991). But women as a group are more likely to do only what is required in class (Linn and Hyde, 1989). Similarly, Arch and Cummings (1989) found that
Women at the college level when left to their own devices are simply less willing than males to take advantage of available opportunities for acquiring computers skills and as a consequence fall even further behind . . . Where exposure to computers is not formally structured into coursework, females use the machine less and feel less positive about them.
In computing, it is mostly the men who read magazines, browse the Web and play games. Explicitly exposing all students to the computing culture levels the playing field and provides opportunities to explore more humanized and contextualized aspect of computing. The next section discusses specific computing artifacts.Computing Artifacts
Cultural artifacts are products of a civilization. Trying to catalog all computing artifacts can be overwhelming and counterproductive. A detailed but selective list of computing artifacts, which is consistently being updated, can be found on http://www.kean.edu/~dbernste/cult. These include:
Informal and formal class discussions can be centered around computing artifacts. The discussions can be led by the instructor or students. Book reviews are good assignments for Writing Emphasis courses. Joining E-mail lists and participating in conversations increase students' confidence in the freewheeling give and take of computer communication.
Computing culture can be a component of every Computing course. In CIS1, I require students to be comfortable with:
There is an overwhelming amount of information, gossip and recycled hearsay on computing in the non academic media. One of my colleagues asked. "How do you get the time to do it all? I don't have time to cover the material I already teach." Here are some hints:
By the end of the term, student response to including the computing culture was overwhelmingly positive. They mention various artifacts as highlights of the course. Some admit that they did not feel this way at the beginning of the semester.
At first, many students are not comfortable with discussing items relating to the culture of computing. They cannot connect one point with another or may find it boring. Then like pieces of a puzzle, things start to fit together. Buzzwords that were discussed in class, an item on the evening news and a lead story in a weekly newsmagazine are all about the same issue. They accept that understanding computing issues is an important part of becoming a computing professional. Then students start to be on the lookout for new material and drive the class discussion. And that's when we know we have succeeded.References
Occupations Salary Percentage Growth Computer Engineer 70,000 112 Computer System Analyst 53,000 110 Physical Therapist 49,000 88 Teacher, Special Ed 33,644 75 . . . Teacher(Preschool/Kind.) 22,500 54 . . . Computer Repairer 30,212 46 Food Service and Lodging 50,500 44 Management Consultant 60,000 43 . . . Teacher (Secondary) 35,880 37 Sports Instructor 51,500 37 . . . Airline Pilot 95,794 35 Physician 178,000 35 . . . Stockbroker 90,000 33 Accountant/Auditor 37,166 32 Lawyer 58,500 31 Computer Programmer 38,272 30 . . . Pharmacist 49,608 29